Re: Benchmarck PostgreSQL 8.1.4 MySQL 5.0.20 and Oracle 10g2

From: "Olivier Andreotti" <olivier(dot)andreotti(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)wirelesscar(dot)com>, jean-paul(at)argudo(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmarck PostgreSQL 8.1.4 MySQL 5.0.20 and Oracle 10g2
Date: 2006-05-19 10:24:35
Message-ID: d5d40b330605190324u4fd26a80v25bd269bafdcc367@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello everybody !

Thanks for all the advices, iI will try all theses new values, and
i'll post my final values on this thread.

About the benchmark and the results, i dont know if can publish values
about Oracle performance ? For MySQL and PostgreSQL, i think there is
no problems.

Just a last question about the pg_xlog : i understand that the
directory must be moved but i have just 3 disks for the database :
disk 1 and 2 for the data, disk 3 for the indexes, where can i put the
pg_xlog ?

OA.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-19 13:10:20 Re: Benchmarck PostgreSQL 8.1.4 MySQL 5.0.20 and Oracle 10g2
Previous Message Stephen Byers 2006-05-18 20:26:26 Re: why is bitmap index chosen for this query?