Can you run those two queries with psql?
I remember having some trouble running multiple queries in the same pgadmin
process. Both would get stuck until both finished I think. I went to
running a pgadmin process per query.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Robert James <srobertjames(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. I'm running Postgres 8.2 on Windows XP, Intel Core
> Duo (though Postgres seems to use only one 1 core).
> The queries are self joins on very large tables, with lots of nested loops.
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > Robert James wrote:
>> >> Hi. I'm seeing some weird behavior in Postgres. I'm running read only
>> >> queries (SELECT that is - no UPDATE or DELETE or INSERT is happening at
>> >> all). I can run one rather complicated query and the results come
>> >> back... eventually. Likewise with another. But, when I run both
>> >> queries at the same time, Postgres seems to ground to a halt.
>> > They're probably not blocking each other but more likely you're
>> > exhausting your servers resources. If they return "eventually"
>> > individually, then running both at the same time will take at least
>> > "eventually x2".
>> It could be a lot more than x2. If the two queries together eat enough
>> RAM to drive the machine into swapping, where it didn't swap while
>> doing one at a time, the slowdown could be orders of magnitude.
>> Watching vmstat output might be informative --- it would at least give
>> an idea if the bottleneck is CPU, I/O, or swap.
>> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Doug Hunley||Date: 2009-07-28 17:18:39|
|Subject: really stupid question about checkpointing|
|Previous:||From: Robert James||Date: 2009-07-28 13:17:56|
|Subject: Re: Will Postgres ever lock with read only queries?|