Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1

From: NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1
Date: 2008-03-22 05:19:01
Message-ID: d3c4af540803212219u58dd874bp8557df63285895c0@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Hi,

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > NikhilS wrote:
> >> Thanks for taking a look. But if I am not mistaken Gavin and co. are
> working
> >> on a much exhaustive proposal. In light of that maybe this patch might
> not
> >> be needed in the first place?
> >>
> >> I will wait for discussion and a subsequent collective consensus here,
> >> before deciding the further course of actions.
>
> > I think it is unwise to wait on Gavin for a more complex implemention
> > ---  we might end up with nothing for 8.4.  As long as your syntax is
> > compatible with whatever Gavin proposed Gavin can add on to your patch
> > once it is applied.
>
> It would be equally unwise to apply a stopgap patch if we're not certain
> it will be upward compatible with what we want to do later.
>
> I haven't been through the partitioning threads at all yet, but I think
> what we probably want to have when we emerge from commit fest is some
> consensus on what the road map is for partitioning.
>

+2

Regards,
Nikhils
-- 
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Shane AmblerDate: 2008-03-22 08:17:39
Subject: Re: serial arrays?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-22 04:22:49
Subject: Re: Logging conflicted queries on deadlocks

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Luke LonerganDate: 2008-03-22 05:35:17
Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-22 04:22:49
Subject: Re: Logging conflicted queries on deadlocks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group