Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date: 2010-04-26 15:01:41
Message-ID: d1edfc5f47b094247325a14d08bc60a0.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, April 26, 2010 08:52, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> FWIW, here are some more results from pgbench comparing
>> primary and standby (both with Simon's patch).
>
> Was there a difference in CPU  utilization between the primary
> and standby?
>

I haven't monitored it..


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Erik RijkersDate: 2010-04-26 15:04:09
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-04-26 14:46:35
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group