| From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Date: | 2005-02-18 23:27:07 |
| Message-ID: | cv5tl5$1njl$2@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:08:47AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
>>* Christopher Kings-Lynne (chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au) wrote:
>>
>>>PostgreSQL has replication, but not partitioning (which is what you want).
>>
>>It doesn't have multi-server partitioning.. It's got partitioning
>>within a single server (doesn't it? I thought it did, I know it was
>>discussed w/ the guy from Cox Communications and I thought he was using
>>it :).
>
>
> No, PostgreSQL doesn't support any kind of partitioning, unless you
> write it yourself. I think there's some work being done in this area,
> though.
Seen my last attempts to perform an horizontal partition I have to say
that postgres do not support it even if you try to write it yourself
(see my post "horizontal partion" ).
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-19 04:11:08 | Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2005-02-18 23:20:08 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |