Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hardware suggestions

From: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: christian(dot)braun(at)tudor(dot)lu, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware suggestions
Date: 2007-06-21 12:43:07
Message-ID: cone.1182429787.17913.57482.1000@zoraida.natserv.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Scott Marlowe writes:

> and a bit more resiliant to drive failure, RAID-5 can give you a lot of 
> storage and very good read performance, so it works well for reporting / 

New controllers now also have Raid 6, which from the few reports I have seen 
seems to have a good compromise of performance and space.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Rainer BauerDate: 2007-06-21 14:22:57
Subject: Data transfer very slow when connected via DSL
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-06-21 07:14:48
Subject: Re: Volunteer to build a configuration tool

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group