Re: Buglist

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Buglist
Date: 2003-08-22 10:53:29
Message-ID: cjsbkv4kobrvepqiies6o2oj76thv86pgm@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:15:33 +0530, "Shridhar Daithankar"
<shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> wrote:
>> Which leads us to a zero gravity vacuum, that does the lazy vacuum for
>> pages currently available in the buffer cache only. [...]
>
>Since autovacuum issues vacuum analyze only, is it acceptable to say that this
>is taken care of already?

Even a plain VACUUM (without FULL) scans the whole relation to find
the (possibly few) pages that need to be changed. We are trying to
find a way to avoid those needless reads of clean pages, because (a)
they are IOs competing with other disk operations and (b) they push
useful pages out of OS cache and (c) of PG shared buffers. The latter
might become a non-issue with LRU-k, 2Q or ARC. But (a) and (b)
remain.

Servus
Manfred

In response to

  • Re: Buglist at 2003-08-22 06:45:33 from Shridhar Daithankar

Responses

  • Re: Buglist at 2003-08-22 10:57:53 from Shridhar Daithankar

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-08-22 10:57:53 Re: Buglist
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2003-08-22 10:37:14 Re: query optimization: aggregate and distinct

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-08-22 10:57:53 Re: Buglist
Previous Message Harald Fuchs 2003-08-22 09:59:00 Re: [GENERAL] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"