Re: Postgresql 8.0 beta 1 - strange cpu usage statistics and slow

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0 beta 1 - strange cpu usage statistics and slow
Date: 2004-08-24 16:02:17
Message-ID: cgfoqd$6vk$2@floppy.pyrenet.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers-win32

Shelby Cain wrote:

> --- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>>Ah-hah. The win32 hackers should confirm this, but
>>my recollection is
>>that sync/fsync are no-ops under Cygwin (one of the
>>several reasons
>>we would never recommend that port for production
>>use). So this would
>>fit the assumption that the 7.4 code was simply not
>>syncing.
>>
>
>
> Sounds reasonable. However, I don't see the same
> performance hit while doing bulk database operations
> (ie: inserts, deletes, updates). Is that expected
> behavior? Do vacuum operations fsync()/_commit() more
> often?

I think you have other problems around, see the post where
I did some tests.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-08-24 16:07:42 Re: Is it possible...
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-24 15:54:25 Re: No connection to a PG 8.0 Beta 1 win32 server

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-08-24 16:06:49 Re: postmaster.pid
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-24 15:59:34 Re: postmaster.pid