If you want something done right, I guess you have to do it yourself!
Here's the answer to my question. It works great! Or so it seems to:
delete from pg_statistic s
where exists ( select 1
from pg_class as c, pg_attribute as a
where a.attrelid = c.relfilenode
and s.starelid = c.relfilenode
and s.staattnum = a.attnum
and c.relname = 'maindb_astobject'
and attname = 'survey_id'
In the above SQL statement, "maindb_astobject" is the name of the table and
"survey_id" is the name of the column. The statement deletes all the
statistics for the specified column in the specified table.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Douglas Alan <darkwater42(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd like to manually alter the statistics for a column, as for the column
> in question the statistics are causing Postgres to do the wrong thing for my
> purposes. (I.e., a Seq Scan, rather than an Index Scan.) If someone can
> tell me how to achieve this, I would quite grateful.
> P.S. Actually, for this particular problem, just deleting the statistics
> would be fine. I've tried doing:
> alter table maindb_astobject alter column survey_id set statistics 0;
> And then analyzing the column, but when "statistics" for a column are set
> to 0, Postgres seems to leave the current statistics in place, which is not
> the right thing for me at all. I can successfully set "statistics" to 1,
> but that turns out to be one statistic too many.
> I've tried settings the statistics via the table "pg_stats", but that turns
> out to be a view, and Postgres won't allow to me to alter it.
> Perhaps I can achieve the end by altering the "pg_statistic" table instead,
> but that table is more than a bit opaque to me.
> P.P.S The Seq Scan is 2-4 orders of magnitude slower than the Index Scan.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Anton Marchenkov||Date: 2009-06-02 07:38:56|
|Subject: Order by parameter inside pgsql function ignored|
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2009-06-02 03:22:13|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L')|