Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers
Date: 2016-09-22 01:18:48
Message-ID: ce4f5a44-ae95-ee37-0186-fe4b618815c3@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It seems clear that this patch design is not favored by the community,
so I'm setting the patch as rejected in the CF app.

I think there is interest in managing system resources better, but I
don't know what that would look like.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-09-22 01:35:15 Re: to_date_valid()
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-09-22 01:11:29 Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql