Re: Planet posting policy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> Yeah. But that's also drifting off-topic slightly - the question in
> debate here is "do we want to relax the rules", which a number of
> people have been in favour of, and only one against if I'm counting
> correctly, and if so, how do we do so without going too far in the
> other direction? We only really need a moderation system if people
> don't follow the guidelines.

Counting, and polls, is silly: what we really need is a rough consensus
(from those of us that care enough to read this list) on what is best
for the project. Nonetheless, count me as a -1 for changing the
guidelines until a better rationale and some solid examples are given.
I think the onus is on those proposing a change to convince us the
status quo is not working.

Also -1 to creating a second "corporate-focused" blog.

For an example of what a aggregator with a more relaxed policy might
look like, check out planet.mysql.com. It used to be a tighter,
more technically focused blog, but it is now a firehouse of all sorts
of things that I find challenging to wade through and keep up with
(although the blast of Oracle-related posts has subsided a bit in
the past few months).

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201202011838
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk8pzYgACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgxzgCeJnwfDnprvvh7FdYkz3ZVGj0J
PmgAnRcLwkouTNfb8y1SQG2rnJkB+fTd
=TOz0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----