Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing

From: "Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing
Date: 2008-04-25 21:13:33
Message-ID: ca33c0a30804251413s457e5b08icf3d3ae102e69bea@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Oops, sorry for the crossed emails, slight delay in my main being received.

On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>  I think with something like your 16bit/16bit design, and say ten free
>  codes between each original assignment, it'd be okay to not support the
>  rewriting stuff at all.

Yeah. I'm more concerned about someone wanting reordering, hence the
second option in my other mail.

Cheers

Tom

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-25 21:21:25
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing
Previous:From: Tom DunstanDate: 2008-04-25 21:10:06
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-25 21:21:25
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing
Previous:From: Tom DunstanDate: 2008-04-25 21:10:06
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group