Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

From: Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
Date: 2010-03-23 23:37:08
Message-ID: ca24673e1003231637v568fc630sbba3cefec10fe7be@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
MyISAM is SQLLite with some threading ;-)

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > What about InnoDB?
>
> Depends on what parts of mysql they otherwise use.  There are plenty
> of features that won't work if you're using non-myisam tables, like
> full text search.  I tend to think any full blown (or nearly so) db is
> overkill for mythtv, and the use of something like sqllite or berkely
> db tables is a better fit.
>

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2010-03-23 23:59:10
Subject: Re: tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-23 23:35:33
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group