Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:53:22 -0500, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Marko Tiikkaja > <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> wrote: >> On 2010-02-11 03:44 +0200, I wrote: >>> I'm going to have to disappoint a bunch of people and give up. :-( >> >> Btw. would it make sense to apply the WITH-on-top-of-DML part of this >> patch? At least to me, this seems useful because you can write a >> RECURSIVE SELECT and then use UPDATE .. FROM or DELETE .. USING on that >> CTE. > > Hmm, that's a thought. Can you split out just that part? Here's the patch. It's the same as the stuff in writeable CTE patches, but I added regression tests. Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
Attachment: with_on_dml.patch
Description: text/plain (14.9 KB)
Description: text/plain (14.9 KB)
In response to
- Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations at 2010-02-11 15:53:22 from Robert Haas
Responses
- Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations at 2010-02-11 17:35:18 from Marko Tiikkaja
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: 2010-02-11 17:29:33 Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL Previous: From: Joshua D. Drake Date: 2010-02-11 17:24:55 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog