Re: pg_type.h regression?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_type.h regression?
Date: 2008-09-23 13:35:56
Message-ID: c71349f24c56116edba6417fee7dbec4@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> [ scratches head... ] I seem to have done that in rev 1.198, but I
>> don't recall why. It's late here though ...

> I think my reasoning was that all array types should have typdelim = ','
> for consistency. It doesn't actually matter because nothing looks at
> the value ... the element type's delimiter is what array_in/out use.

Ah, okay, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation, I'll tweak
my code to do it the right way by looking at the base type.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809230934
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkjY8GIACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiOxgCgmpuxlkzQYlJNCdNCGc7houn7
hwQAoKfyLX3t5ArtEzaytD+nWOCl/br1
=QNIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-23 13:40:39 Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-23 13:34:39 Re: hash index improving v3