Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0

From: usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Date: 2006-10-28 20:18:36
Message-ID: c39ec84c0610281318m2b66dcefnab43dfb9192afc23@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Dear Joshua, List,

On 10/28/06, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> So how about instead of spending all this time on this thread we start
> working on more articles, techdocs, case studies and benchmarks that
> show that we totally kick arse!

that sounds great. about 2 weeks ago i did a suggestion regarding the
lack of documentation regarding the disjunction operator ( ie: what is
it? ).

i thought it was a proper suggestion. i "submitted" the
google-soc-link to the pgfoundry page.

regards,

usleep

>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> --
>
>       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
>              http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Michael DeanDate: 2006-10-28 20:40:21
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Previous:From: Lukas Kahwe SmithDate: 2006-10-28 20:04:49
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group