Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?

From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?
Date: 2008-06-07 17:26:20
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0806071026l7d04e44dpb2b5a9faa577c788@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
> like "Never released".  Thoughts?
>

"Never released" sounds better, otherwise people wil find an
inconsistency between release notes and downloadable tarballs


-- 
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitaciĆ³n de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 87171157

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-06-07 21:40:17
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-07 17:02:57
Subject: "Release date" for aborted releases?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group