On 1/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> writes:
> > Err, I think you misunderstood what I said. My implementation uses
> > SAVEPOINTs already. The point is having some API where you do not have
> > to care of you are already in a transaction or not.
> It's not that hard, is it?
> if (PQtransactionStatus(conn) == PQTRANS_IDLE)
> PQexec(conn, "BEGIN");
> PQexec(conn, "SAVEPOINT foo");
> regards, tom lane
and how the releases and commit will happen? all at once or one by one?
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2007-01-04 01:46:57|
|Subject: Re: xlog directory at initdb time|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2007-01-04 01:05:27|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files|