Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

From: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date: 2005-12-16 19:29:05
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0512161129o3676d34cn7e0b7b1016eb49db@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Also, I don't actually see any point to this in psql, as you can
> always do
>        begin;
>        \i file
>        end;
> It's only pg_restore that you really need it for.  Dropping the psql
> part of the patch might give us a little more maneuvering room as far
> as the switch name goes.
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

maybe it could be handy if you do this to migrate from one version to another...
pg_dumpall base | psql

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2005-12-16 19:41:26
Subject: Win32 gettimeofday() comment patch
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2005-12-16 19:04:58
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group