Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication, loose ends

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Date: 2010-01-15 17:59:05
Message-ID: c24c7ec603a375862182eeecc9123e27@biglumber.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


>>>> +1, it is not replication. I would call it something like continuous
>>>> archiving or streaming pitr

I agree we should consider a different name.

> But I'm still wondering why this isn't replication.

Because replication is an ambiguous and overloaded term.

On the other hand, it's a great buzzword, so we should use
the phrase as much as possible in the press releases. :)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001151257
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktQrNYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj8NACgwIQVq/GGQoY/4U6pAYyR5IeS
EsoAoLjoYlLErv4g3Vy65rbA9u9W0vww
=u2Hk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-01-15 18:03:53
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-01-15 17:53:57
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group