Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3

From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(at)math(dot)ethz(dot)ch>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Didier Verna <didier(at)xemacs(dot)org>, "Stephen J(dot) Turnbull" <turnbull(at)sk(dot)tsukuba(dot)ac(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, XEmacs beta testers <xemacs-beta(at)xemacs(dot)org>, Oliver Elphick <Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
Date: 2000-04-11 14:10:21
Message-ID: byg0ssybhu.fsf@math.ethz.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> writes:

> There is no harm in having 20 -I's on the compile line unless the user has
> more than one header file with the same name on his system, in which case
> most everything else on it is going to break as well.

This in fact one of the problems that caused us to switch to the newer
inclusion mechanism. (prompted by the mess that is libXawXXXX)

Jan

P.S. I would be interested in knowing what problem the user had for
which you made change. Maybe it is relevant for use too?

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Didier Verna 2000-04-11 14:19:25 Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-04-11 12:33:59 Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3