From: | Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(at)math(dot)ethz(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Didier Verna <didier(at)xemacs(dot)org>, "Stephen J(dot) Turnbull" <turnbull(at)sk(dot)tsukuba(dot)ac(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, XEmacs beta testers <xemacs-beta(at)xemacs(dot)org>, Oliver Elphick <Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |
Date: | 2000-04-11 14:10:21 |
Message-ID: | byg0ssybhu.fsf@math.ethz.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut <e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE> writes:
> There is no harm in having 20 -I's on the compile line unless the user has
> more than one header file with the same name on his system, in which case
> most everything else on it is going to break as well.
This in fact one of the problems that caused us to switch to the newer
inclusion mechanism. (prompted by the mess that is libXawXXXX)
Jan
P.S. I would be interested in knowing what problem the user had for
which you made change. Maybe it is relevant for use too?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Didier Verna | 2000-04-11 14:19:25 | Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-04-11 12:33:59 | Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |