Re: pljava revisited

From: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pljava revisited
Date: 2003-12-12 07:30:26
Message-ID: brbql9$kpi$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The sqlstandards.org is still down I think. Is this something new in the
upcoming 200x spec? I could not see it mentioned in the SQL-99.

I'm a great fan of standards. If there is one I'll make my pljava adhere to
it. Any information on this topic is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

- thomas

"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote in message
news:200312120059(dot)12142(dot)peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > >>What are your thoughts and ideas?
> > >
> > >Instead of making up your own stuff, there's a whole SQL standard
> > > that tells you how Java embedded in an SQL server should work. Of
> > > course that doesn't tell you about implementation details.
> >
> > Where can it be found?
>
> Developer FAQ 1.12
>
> But the sqlstandards.org server appears to be down right now.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2003-12-12 12:22:00 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-12 06:49:26 fsync method checking