Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS

From: "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS
Date: 2003-09-04 01:22:33
Message-ID: bj647d$234o$1@news.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Yes I Analyze also, but there was no need to because it was a fresh brand
new database.

"Rudi Starcevic" <rudi(at)oasis(dot)net(dot)au> wrote in message
news:3F569012(dot)3090209(at)oasis(dot)net(dot)au(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Hi,
>
>
> >And yes I did a vacuum.
> >
>
> Did you 'Analyze' too ?
>
> Cheers
> Rudi.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>



In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: RelaxinDate: 2003-09-04 01:24:31
Subject: Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS
Previous:From: Rudi StarcevicDate: 2003-09-04 01:06:26
Subject: Re: SELECT's take a long time compared to other DBMS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group