Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Windows port

From: "Bupp Phillips" <hello(at)noname(dot)com>
To: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows port
Date: 2003-08-27 06:00:10
Message-ID: bihhcr$26vc$1@news.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Maybe I misunderstood, will Postgresql.org support a native Windows port or
will it always be an outside company that will do the Windows porting?

I would perfer one from Postgresql.org so that I can always get the latest
fixes without having to wait for the outside party to decide when and if
they are going to incorporate the changes.

Thanks

"Chris M" <chris(at)none(dot)none> wrote in message
news:big172$2stv$2(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Please visit: http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/Windows
>
> PowerGres by SRA, UltraSQL by PeerDirect both are native
> Windows port. The latter seems stopping at beta4.
>
> "Bupp Phillips" <hello(at)noname(dot)com>  news:bidp4j$n6e$1(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> > I here that a beta version of a native Windows port is available, where
> can
> > I download this for testing?
> >
> > One other question...it doesn't use Cygwin, does it?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
>



In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2003-08-27 19:26:06
Subject: Re: Windows port
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-08-27 04:11:23
Subject: Re: Windows port

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group