Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 10:54:02
Message-ID: bddc86151001210254y43d78fd2o8b81312e01bf48f0@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-hackers
2010/1/21 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>

> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>
> Wait for it....
>
> 9.0.
>
>
>
I feel sorry for 8.5 now.  It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
version.

So, does this mean the next alpha/beta will be named 9.0 too?

Thom

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-01-21 10:57:35
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous:From: Takahiro ItagakiDate: 2010-01-21 10:42:30
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-01-21 10:57:35
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-01-21 10:39:39
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group