Re: New mug design

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Rob Napier <rob(at)doitonce(dot)net(dot)au>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New mug design
Date: 2009-11-28 22:05:53
Message-ID: bddc86150911281405t1b755785ic20e2d0668aef025@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

2009/11/28 Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>

> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Rob Napier wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest that you combine the two ideas:
>>>
>>> INSERT INTO pg_mug VALUES('coffee', 'water', 'sugar', 'cream');
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> And
>>>
>>> BEGIN;
>>>>> CREATE TABLE postgresql (mug_id SERIAL);
>>>>> COMMIT;
>>>>>
>>>>
>> You mean:
>>
>> BEGIN;
>> CREATE TABLE pg_mug (contents TEXT);
>> INSERT INTO pg_mug VALUES('coffee', 'sugar', 'cream');
>> COMMIT;
>>
>> ?
>>
>> I don't think "water" makes sense unless you are making instant coffee,
>> which I think is atypical.
>>
>
> Ummm ... last I checked, that query will fail with too many fields? :)
>
>
> I proposed this: http://wiki.postgresql.eu/wiki/Image:Psql-mug.png

Thom

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-11-28 22:52:36 Re: New mug design
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2009-11-28 21:58:28 Re: New mug design