Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: vacuumdb error

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error
Date: 2009-10-16 13:07:18
Message-ID: bddc86150910160607k54be50b5od476e2e455f0a74c@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
2009/10/16 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> Thanks Heikki.  You probably already know, but remember to prevent it
>> using FREEZE at all for 8.5+ as according to the documentation it's
>> being deprecated.
>
> It's been documented as deprecated since 8.2, in favor of the
> vacuum_freeze_max_age option. However, it's still widely used in the
> field, and there's no immediate reason to remove it, so I don't think
> we're actually going to remove it in the foreseeable future.
>
> --
>  Heikki Linnakangas
>  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

Sorry, I mean the actual keyword will be removed meaning it would
error if used as an option, although whether it'll be in 8.5 I don't
actually know.

Thom

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-10-16 13:32:20
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-10-16 12:40:24
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group