Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: vacuumdb error

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error
Date: 2009-10-16 12:28:03
Message-ID: bddc86150910160528o4b92d54bp2e56de40a61f3228@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
2009/10/16 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> This is either a bug in vacuumdb with it not using the correct order,
>> or postgres shouldn't be paying attention to the order of the
>> keywords.  In any case, it doesn't work.  I've searched the postgres
>> FAQs, TODO and mailing list archives, but can't find a mention of
>> this.
>
> Thanks, fixed. We had the same bug with FREEZE and ANALYZE combination,
> which was fixed in April, but the order between FREEZE and VERBOSE was
> still incorrect.
>
> --
>  Heikki Linnakangas
>  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

Thanks Heikki.  You probably already know, but remember to prevent it
using FREEZE at all for 8.5+ as according to the documentation it's
being deprecated.

Thom

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-10-16 12:40:24
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-10-16 10:39:09
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group