Re: Record variable not behaving as expected (bug?)

From: "Postgres User" <postgres(dot)developer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Postgres User" <postgres(dot)developer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Record variable not behaving as expected (bug?)
Date: 2007-11-30 20:31:53
Message-ID: b88c3460711301231t305d4907o738c360c20e20180@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sure, I'd be glad to provide any additional code or info that I can.
This issue took me quite awhile to track down from the 200-line
function that was breaking.

When I execute the function defined above, here's what I see returned:

select divide()
?column?
------------------------
0

Hopefully someone can test on Windows to validate.

On Nov 30, 2007 8:25 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:20:30AM -0800, Postgres User wrote:
> > tom- did you test this on wndows? you can ignore the namespace- i'm
> > using it consistently but removed from the test code to simplify
> >
> > this problem occurs repeatedly in my code. my guess is that it's a
> > bug in the windows build.
>
> Seems rather unlikely to affect just windows. Can you post a script
> that you can run against a blank database that shows the problem.
> complete with output on your machine.
>
>
> Have a nice day,
> --
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> > Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
> > -- John F Kennedy
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHUDmUIB7bNG8LQkwRAvNMAKCQl8+bPo3bca/a33T+WVfQ/Ng2yQCdG+H5
> wZyc/alsznWsWck20lheR00=
> =RVrJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Postgres User 2007-11-30 20:34:57 Re: Record variable not behaving as expected (bug?)
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2007-11-30 20:26:15 Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[]