On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> - Stored procedures that can manage transactions (e.g. - contrast with
> present stored functions that forcibly live *inside* a transaction
> context; the point isn't functions vs procedures, but rather to have
> something that can do txn management)
IMO, once the current crop of in-progress features are rolled up (in
place upgrade, hot standby, etc)...this is one of two 'must have'
features...the other being revamped listen/notify.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Finneid||Date: 2009-02-04 19:34:01|
|Subject: case sensitive db name?|
|Previous:||From: David Wall||Date: 2009-02-04 19:02:49|
|Subject: Array, bytea and large objects|