On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> - Stored procedures that can manage transactions (e.g. - contrast with
> present stored functions that forcibly live *inside* a transaction
> context; the point isn't functions vs procedures, but rather to have
> something that can do txn management)

IMO, once the current crop of in-progress features are rolled up (in
place upgrade, hot standby, etc)...this is one of two 'must have'
features...the other being revamped listen/notify.

merlin

In response to

• Re: Pet Peeves? at 2009-02-02 21:54:08 from Christopher Browne

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Thomas Finneid	Date: 2009-02-04 19:34:01
	Subject: case sensitive db name?
Previous:	From: David Wall	Date: 2009-02-04 19:02:49
	Subject: Array, bytea and large objects