Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-02-04 19:31:36
Message-ID: b42b73150902041131w7a17c79bk2e813223679eec8d@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> - Stored procedures that can manage transactions (e.g. - contrast with
> present stored functions that forcibly live *inside* a transaction
> context; the point isn't functions vs procedures, but rather to have
> something that can do txn management)

IMO, once the current crop of in-progress features are rolled up (in
place upgrade, hot standby, etc)...this is one of two 'must have'
features...the other being revamped listen/notify.

merlin

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Thomas FinneidDate: 2009-02-04 19:34:01
Subject: case sensitive db name?
Previous:From: David WallDate: 2009-02-04 19:02:49
Subject: Array, bytea and large objects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group