| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Hodges" <robert(dot)hodges(at)continuent(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-06-01 17:19:10 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150806011019g34be3a34t346ab0ed621bca76@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Robert Hodges
<robert(dot)hodges(at)continuent(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Merlin,
>
> My point here is that with reasonably small extensions to the core you can
> build products that are a lot better than SLONY. Triggers do not cover
> DDL, among other issues, and it's debatable whether they are the best way to
> implement quorum policies like Google's semi-synchronous replication. As I
> mentioned separately this topic deserves another thread which I promise to
> start.
These issues are much discussed and well understood. At this point,
the outstanding points of discussion are technical...how to make this
thing work.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-01 17:43:22 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Robert Hodges | 2008-06-01 15:58:59 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-01 17:23:45 | Re: explain doesn't work with execute using |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-06-01 16:49:49 | Re: explain doesn't work with execute using |