| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Dunstan" <tom(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries |
| Date: | 2007-08-31 18:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150708311136w5af78f33r98b6275315ba8c2c@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 8/31/07, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > > Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
> >
> > Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
>
> works fine (here was my test). thanks for quick resolution to this
> issue. strings returned in binary format is IMO ok.
> if(t != PGRES_COMMAND_OK & t != PGRES_TUPLES_OK)
oops, this line was wrong. the enum is fine though.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-08-31 18:38:25 | Re: Password requirement in windows installer |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-08-31 18:32:34 | Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-31 18:40:06 | Re: HOT patch - version 14 |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-08-31 18:32:34 | Re: [HACKERS] enum types and binary queries |