Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL List Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "postgresql performance list" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Date: 2007-07-25 01:28:00
Message-ID: b42b73150707241828h778e235em62e9c5fdfabc9509@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-performance
On 7/20/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> > Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to use in
> > my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without HOT would be
> > even better (I know we've got HOT-specific benchmarks, but I want
> > complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
>
> We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchmark for PostgreSQL.  On
> that it's +9% without HOT and +13% with HOT.  I think SpecJ would show a
> greater difference, but we're still focussed on benchmarks we can
> publish (i.e. 8.2.4) right now.

Are there any industry standard benchmarks that you know of which
PostgreSQL excels at?

merlin

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-07-25 02:45:58
Subject: Re: Performance issue with 8.2.3 - "C" application
Previous:From: Karl DenningerDate: 2007-07-25 01:20:09
Subject: Performance issue with 8.2.3 - "C" application

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-07-25 03:42:58
Subject: Re: Updated tsearch documentation
Previous:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2007-07-24 20:58:50
Subject: Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group