On 12/07/2008, Wright, George <George(dot)Wright(at)infimatic(dot)com> wrote:
> So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural
> language functions in postgresql?
Let's say it's not easy to just "read" the definition ... one can go
and use a disassembler to see what your procedure does if one
feels the urge (and is good with assembler). The question is also:
"whom do you want to stop from seeing them?"
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
In response to
pgsql-novice by date
|Next:||From: Wright, George||Date: 2008-07-11 16:59:16|
|Subject: Re: function source|
|Previous:||From: Mark Roberts||Date: 2008-07-11 16:22:52|
|Subject: Re: Number of postgres connections|