Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: function source

From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Wright, George" <George(dot)Wright(at)infimatic(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: function source
Date: 2008-07-11 16:57:01
Message-ID: b35603930807110957oa3fd84cp4fbb6a86799830bf@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
On 12/07/2008, Wright, George <George(dot)Wright(at)infimatic(dot)com> wrote:
> So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural
>  language functions in postgresql?
Let's say it's not easy to just "read" the definition ... one can go
and use a disassembler to see what your procedure does if one
feels the urge (and is good with assembler).  The question is also:
"whom do you want to stop from seeing them?"



-- 
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :}  Make your quotes concise.

http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm

In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Wright, GeorgeDate: 2008-07-11 16:59:16
Subject: Re: function source
Previous:From: Mark RobertsDate: 2008-07-11 16:22:52
Subject: Re: Number of postgres connections

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group