Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date: 2008-05-01 02:16:31
Message-ID: b35603930804301916o63e1062o10bf882a89a53f5@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On 01/05/2008, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>  Further, I've asked the TrustedSolaris folks to take a look at KaiGai's
>  implementation to see if it was "generic" enough for them to build on as a
>  test of whether SE-Postgres was too specific to SE-Linux; the answer has
>  been a tentative "yes, it's generic".

>  So it would be much better to have this functionality be "mainstream"
>  rather than a fork.  If it does get bounced, please do it becuase of code
>  quality and not because "nobody is asking for this".

Not a hacker, just a curious reader ... are there equivalent frameworks
for the other supported platforms?  E.g. MacOS, *BSD, Windows? Are
the similarities between those (if they exist) close enough not to introduce
a maintenance nightmare?


Cheers,
Andrej

-- 
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :}  Make your quotes concise.

http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2008-05-01 03:24:26
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-05-01 02:11:34
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2008-05-01 03:24:26
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-05-01 02:11:34
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group