On 01/02/2008, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> wrote:
> The part about the BSD license is bogus. A BSD license is the most
> desirable of any Open Source license and gives you the right to use
> PostgreSQL in your commercial apps without worry.
While I'm a big fan of the BSD license (for varied reasons) I think that
OpenSource hardliners like RMS would argue that the BSD license is *NOT*
in the true spirit of OpenSource *BECAUSE* of what you list as a bonus
of it ... the locking down of benefits reaped from OpenSource not getting
back into the stream.
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Guy Rouillier||Date: 2008-01-31 21:40:11|
|Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?|
|Previous:||From: Adam Rich||Date: 2008-01-31 21:04:42|
|Subject: Re: Oracle Analytical Functions|