Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users

From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com" <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
Date: 2006-05-24 18:25:22
Message-ID: b35603930605241125l694a4b14ud58144710c7ac2eb@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
On 5/25/06, operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com
> imho, both are acceptably fast for the vast majority
> of applications (which is why i went with features -
> not the least of which was the license) and if it gets
> so big it grinds to a halt, you are likely in the
> commercial db space, anyway.
/me has seen highly expensive, poorly designed Oracle implementations
on amazing hardware grind to a halt ... :}

In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: operationsengineer1Date: 2006-05-24 19:57:15
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
Previous:From: operationsengineer1Date: 2006-05-24 16:26:29
Subject: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group