Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)

From: Sergey Koposov <koposov(at)ast(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)
Date: 2013-01-16 15:03:52
Message-ID: alpine.LRH.2.03.1301161446170.11753@ast.cam.ac.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Andres Freund wrote:
>> So unless somebody suggest otherwise, i'm going to switch to gcc on this
>> buildfarm.
>
> What about switching to -O1 of 11.1?

I don't know. It is up to -hackers to decide. I think that icc on ia64 
have shown bugginess time after time. But if you think that buildfarm 
with icc 11.1 -O1 carry more information than say running gcc, i can 
still run icc.

 	S

*****************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov, PhD, Research Associate
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge
Madingley road, CB3 0HA, Cambridge, UK
Tel: +44-1223-337-551 Web: http://www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~koposov/


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2013-01-16 15:08:33
Subject: Re: log_lock_waits to identify transaction's relation
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2013-01-16 14:56:20
Subject: Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group