Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4

From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4
Date: 2010-09-02 05:53:28
Message-ID: alpine.LFD.2.01.1009020749380.19625@bbs.intern
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Tom Lane wrote:

> Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com> writes:
>> BTW: I have the old data setup. /var/lib/pgsql-old. Is there a fast setup
>> with old version on different TCP port possible to compare query plans?
>
> You'll need to reinstall the old executables. If you put the new
> executables in the same directories, it's not going to be easy to
> run both in parallel. If you didn't, then you just need to start
> the old postmaster using a different port number.
>

I tried to get 8.3.11 ready again:
# Problems with timezone on startup (Default not found)
./configure --with-system-tzdata=/usr/share
cp ./src/backend/postgres /bin/postgres-8.3.11
su -l postgres -c "/bin/postgres-8.3.11 -p 54321 -D
/var/lib/pgsql-old/data &" >> /var/lib/pgsql-old/pgstartup.log 2>&1 < /dev/null

Problem is that PostgreSQL doesn't listen and take much CPU and also disk
I/O. 8.3 was shut down cleanly. 8.4 runs in parallel. Are there any
problems with shared buffer conflicts?

PID USER PR NI VIRT SWAP RES CODE DATA SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
6997 postgres 20 0 113m 112m 1236 3688 1064 712 D 38.7 0.0 0:45.43 /bin/postgres-8.3.11 -p 54321 -D /var/lib/pgsql-old/data

Any ideas?

Thnx.

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-02 13:14:38 Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-08-31 18:56:53 Re: Performance on new 64bit server compared to my 32bit desktop