On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, dforum wrote:
> there is other performance problem on this request.
> If you analyse query plan, you see that most of the time are lost during
> sequencial scan, and you have 2 seq scan.
Nonsense. Sequential scans account for all of one or two seconds of
processing in these queries, which are 14 seconds and 38 minutes
Doctor: Are you okay? You appear to be injured.
Doctor: It's okay, it looks superficial.
Neelix: Am I going to die?
Doctor: Not unless you are allergic to tomatoes. This appears to be a sauce
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-04-16 17:52:35|
|Subject: Re: GiST index performance |
|Previous:||From: dforum||Date: 2009-04-16 17:19:18|
|Subject: Re: GiST index performance|