| From: | david(at)lang(dot)hm |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql |
| Date: | 2008-03-18 20:01:28 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.1.00.0803181259540.21250@asgard.lang.hm |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Gregory Stark wrote:
> <david(at)lang(dot)hm> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 18/03/2008, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>>>> Isn't a 10 or 24 spindle RAID 5 array awfully likely to encounter a
>>>> double disk failure (such as during the load imposed by rebuild onto a
>>>> spare) ?
>>
>> that's why you should use raid6 (allowing for dual failures)
>
> You can have as many parity drives as you want with RAID 5 too.
you can? I've never seen a raid 5 setup with more then a single parity
dirve (or even the option of having more then one drives worth of
redundancy). you can have hot-spare drives, but thats a different thing.
what controller/software lets you do this?
David Lang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Steben | 2008-03-18 21:06:45 | question on TRUNCATE vs VACUUM FULL |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-03-18 19:46:53 | Re: What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql |