| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC |
| Date: | 2013-02-08 16:43:26 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.BSO.2.00.1302081134320.15260@leary.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Seamus Abshere wrote:
> I personally don't know of any way around the conflict except changing
> JDBC or hstore, and I don't think JDBC is gonna change.
>
I think changing JDBC is the way to go. Currently JDBC supports escape
sequences for cross database portability and it seems reasonable to
support an escape sequence that allowed passing ? to the backend instead
of interpreting it as a parameter. This will be more complicated than you
might hope because the escape processing currently happens prior to bind
parameter detection so I'm not sure what a good patch would really look
like, but given the feedback provided here, it's worth investigating.
Kris Jurka
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2013-02-08 16:48:50 | Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-02-08 16:39:04 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |