Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Date: 2010-04-20 18:19:52
Message-ID: alpine.BSO.2.00.1004201418530.30295@leary.csoft.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Nikolas Everett wrote:

> You can absolutely use copy if you like but you need to use a non-standard
> jdbc driver:  kato.iki.fi/sw/db/postgresql/jdbc/copy/.  I've used it in the
> past and it worked.

Copy support has been added to the 8.4 driver.

Kris Jurka

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2010-04-20 18:20:18
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-04-20 18:17:02
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group