On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It more or less prevents use of fancy types. There doesn't seem to be
> to set an unspecified type on a per-parameter basis, unfortunately.
Use setObject(int, object, Types.OTHER);
Next:From: Emanuel CoutoDate: 2009-09-03 19:32:52
Subject: Error in webpage
Previous:From: Florian WeimerDate: 2009-09-03 13:59:11
Subject: Re: Search content within a bytea field