Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
To: "Ruben Rubio" <ruben(at)rentalia(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem
Date: 2007-09-13 15:31:05
Message-ID: af1bce590709130831r679a8d63q7ad289804879f1f5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

How many backends do you have at any given time? Have you tried using
something like pgBouncer to lower backend usage? How about your IO
situation? Have you run something like sysstat to see what iowait is
at?

On 9/11/07, Ruben Rubio <ruben(at)rentalia(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I having the same problem I told here a few weeks before. Database is
> using too much resources again.
>
> I do a vacumm full each day, but seems it is not working. I am preparing
> an update to postgres 8.2.4 (actually I am using at 8.1.3, and tests for
> update will need several days)
>
> Last time I had this problem i solved it stopping website, restarting
> database, vacuumm it, run again website. But I guess this is going to
> happen again.
>
> I would like to detect and solve the problem. Any ideas to detect it?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFG5jbLIo1XmbAXRboRArcpAJ0YvoCT6KWv2fafVAtapu6nwFmKoACcD0uA
> zFTx9Wq+2NSxijIf/R8E5f8=
> =u0k5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brad Nicholson 2007-09-13 15:35:59 Re: Long Running Commits - Not Checkpoints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-13 15:10:09 Re: Long Running Commits - Not Checkpoints