Re: Vacuum ALL FULL

From: S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum ALL FULL
Date: 2009-06-06 22:59:53
Message-ID: abf9211d0906061559l4e77783cy1d18f5f3f0e087d0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

So is it no use running
vacuumdb --all --analyze --full
as fsm map is full?

-Arvind S

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:24 AM, S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thanks Tom,
> So do i have to increase the max_fsm_relation based on (Average_no_relation
> per db * number of db)? if so it will be very high since in our one db
> server we have 200 db with average 800 tables in each db. What is the value
> we have to give for this kind of server?
>
> -Arvind S
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> S Arvind <arvindwill(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > But there nearly only 300 tables in that db. Is the free space map is
>> per
>> > DB or for all DB. Can i know the reason of this problem?
>>
>> It's across all DBs in the installation.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-06 23:02:33 Re: Vacuum ALL FULL
Previous Message S Arvind 2009-06-06 22:54:29 Re: Vacuum ALL FULL