Re: Some new list.c primitives

From: Thomas Swan <thomas(dot)swan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some new list.c primitives
Date: 2005-07-28 17:50:05
Message-ID: abb19e6c050728105067790f8d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/28/05, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > How about list_append_distinct and list_concat_distinct?
>
> Those names are fine with me.

list_append_unique and list_concat_unique might be a little clearer, unless
you want to retain the sqlism of distinct.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-07-28 17:51:02 Write past chunk end?
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-07-28 17:14:48 Re: psql as an execve(2) interpreter