Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Some new list.c primitives

From: Thomas Swan <thomas(dot)swan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some new list.c primitives
Date: 2005-07-28 17:50:05
Message-ID: abb19e6c050728105067790f8d@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 7/28/05, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > How about list_append_distinct and list_concat_distinct?
> 
> Those names are fine with me.


list_append_unique and list_concat_unique might be a little clearer, unless 
you want to retain the sqlism of distinct.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-07-28 17:51:02
Subject: Write past chunk end?
Previous:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2005-07-28 17:14:48
Subject: Re: psql as an execve(2) interpreter

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group