Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting previous statements executed a backend currenly in an <idle> in transaction state.

From: "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Lista Postgres" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting previous statements executed a backend currenly in an <idle> in transaction state.
Date: 2007-01-22 08:05:59
Message-ID: a97c77030701220005w7adae9e6t940e5c3a2a864c69@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
> AFAICS, log_statement and friends are much cheaper than any other
> alternative could be.

Dear Sir,
thanks for the reply and clarifying.
regds
mallah.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Simon KinsellaDate: 2007-01-22 10:50:15
Subject: FW: Possible to emulate pre-8.2 behaviour of SET CONSTRAINTS?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-22 06:44:58
Subject: Re: Getting previous statements executed a backend currenly in an <idle> in transaction state.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group