Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Date: 2003-04-14 13:48:45
Message-ID: a90b1033991b464ffd0f4997a5193f24@biglumber.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> However, I can only reasonably manage Techdocs if it's on a production-ready 
> Content Management System, with simplified page editing, multi-user rights 
> management, and revision history.

Call me a traditionalist, but how about the traditional cvs + "your favorite editor" 
approach? I don't think the techdocs section changes so often that we need 
fancy wiki / edit-from-the-web-on-the-fly sort of technology here. I also agree 
with Marc that there is no need to move it elsewhere right now. Let's just keep 
it simple, focus on the content, and add other things later.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200304140946

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+mrwvvJuQZxSWSsgRAvMtAJ9CrkU1WgOf5SafG8l4aJYJpsWOfACgsCHI
C+DCSdHAkMnhFmIu9ctw2dA=
=ZhMl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2003-04-14 14:29:49
Subject: Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Previous:From: justinDate: 2003-04-14 13:44:22
Subject: Fwd: A within the next day or two request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group