On 15/02/06, Jay Greenfield <jag(at)timberline(dot)ca> wrote:
> I've been vacuuming between each test run.
> Not vacuuming results in times all the way up to 121 minutes. For a
> comparison with Access, the vacuuming time with Postgres should really be
> included as this is not required with Access.
Hmm but then you would have to include Access Vacuum too I'll think you will
find "Tools -> Database Utils -> Compact Database" preforms a simular
purpose and is just as important as I've seen many Access Databases bloat in
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Ron||Date: 2006-02-16 13:38:45|
|Subject: Re: [PERFORM] qsort again|
|Previous:||From: Ron||Date: 2006-02-16 13:22:55|
|Subject: Re: qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index|